Do the math, New York Times!

Actually, now you don't have to, because the American Prospect did, and they found out that when it comes to the issue of choice, not one pro-choice op-ed was published on that page in the last two years. That somehow doesn't seem possible, but then again, many things don't seem possible that are actually true. Bush is president. There were no WMDs. Roe v. Wade, legal for over three decades, could disappear. Yet this is not worthy of genuine debate? It's not enough that the editorial page is pro-choice -- the conversation of the nation happens on the op-ed page, and pro-choice voices need to be heard.